3 ms·
As incredible as it might be to believe, the figures are a whole lot uncertain. I've used 4% for long enough that I don't precisely remember how I arrived at i
by ArkyBeagle 12y ago
As incredible as it might be to believe, the figures are a whole lot uncertain.
I've used 4% for long enough that I don't precisely remember how I arrived at it. I probably picked it from the middle of the range. I believe the lower bound is known to be pretty certainly 2.5% of global population. Or it was probably used by some source I've since forgotten.
Figures for China are very uncertain.
"*World-wide casualty estimates vary widely in several sources. The number of civilian deaths in China alone might well be more than 50,000,000."
http://www.nationalww2museum.org/learn/education/for-students/ww2-history/ww2-by-the-numbers/world-wide-deaths.html http://www.nationalww2museum.org/learn/education/for-student...
The uncertainty is kind of astonishing.