3 ms·

This is a fairly weak and circumstantial list, in my opinion. Also, name a player that isn't equally or more abusive? If you mention Apple, Google, or Amazon,

• jacquesm 12y ago
  > This is a fairly weak and circumstantial list, in my opinion. That's fine by me. I think they should really wise up and start to play nice. If IBM could do it then Microsoft can too. > Also, name a player that isn't equally or more abusive? Why, does that excuse them? > If you mention Apple, Google, or Amazon, I'm going to disagree. I would agree with that myself, so I won't be naming those.
  • freehunter 12y ago
    Do you work for IBM? You know they have a history of missteps as well. Did you hear about that thing in WWII?
  • maccard 12y ago
    On the IBM front I think you need to reconsider. http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-02/ibm-says-justice-department-has-started-bribery-probe-correct-.html http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-02/ibm-says-justice... (apologies for mobile link). I've read your comments throughout this thread, and am curious, what will MS have to do to get back in your good books? As far as I'm concerned, they're far less shady than google, oracle, yet your own views seem to be against giving them a chance.
    • jacquesm 12y ago
      That's a good question. Let me think about that.