4 ms·
A lot of the so-called innovation of the past 10 years seems to purely piggyback on Moore's Law, cheaper storage and cheaper bandwidth, i.e. incremental, someti
by patrickk 12y ago
A lot of the so-called innovation of the past 10 years seems to purely piggyback on Moore's Law, cheaper storage and cheaper bandwidth, i.e. incremental, sometimes useful improvements via the web, but no nanotech robots that detect cancer, Mars base, nuclear fusion, etc.
Innovation seems to have stalled in the world of atoms, cars (and transport generally), houses, healthcare etc all not noticeably improving, except incrementally (deliberately ignoring Tesla, which will hopefully have a widespread impact on the entire car industry in the coming years).
Some areas have gotten worse overall, such as finance, which seems to be disconnected from creating value for the wider economy and seems to be getting more unstable and risky as time progresses.
EDIT: I don't mean to sound overly negative, some of the YC RFSs sound quite ambitious, I hope they succeed in attracting more of those types of companies funded and off the ground https://www.ycombinator.com/rfs/ https://www.ycombinator.com/rfs/
- spindritf 12y agoA lot of the so-called innovation of the past 10 years seems to purely piggyback on Moore's Law If you believe Robin Hanson, maybe even all software innovation ever. http://www.overcomingbias.com/2013/06/why-does-hardware-grow-like-algorithms.html http://www.overcomingbias.com/2013/06/why-does-hardware-grow...