3 ms·
RPX IS a patent troll. RPX Corporation is a spin-off of Intellectual Ventures. John Amster and Geoffrey Barker, the CEO and COO of RPX, came from high level p
by denimboy 12y ago
RPX IS a patent troll. RPX Corporation is a spin-off of Intellectual Ventures. John Amster and Geoffrey Barker, the CEO and COO of RPX, came from high level positions inside Intellectual Ventures.
http://pando.com/2013/09/09/rpx-and-the-complicated-business-of-stockpiling-patents-for-good-not-evil/
RPX and Intellectual Ventures bought the Kodak patent portfolio together:
http://www.iam-magazine.com/blog/detail.aspx?g=4d1024d9-1e6c-43fa-8f78-a123f22575da
http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/12/19/kodak-sells-patents-to-intellectual-ventures-rpx-for-525-million/id=31737/
RPX and Intellectual Ventures own a common NPE holding company RPX-LV:
http://www.plainsite.org/flashlight/rpxlv-acquisition-llc/
RPX was sued by Kaspersky Labs for extortion:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56754406/RPX-Criminal-Complaint
RPX cannot be trusted anymore than Intellectual Ventures. RPX is playing the same game as Intellectual Ventures. There is a better than good chance that RPX and Intellectual Ventures are working together as evidenced by their co-ownership of patent property and shared personnel history. The Kaspersky complaint raises the specter of RPX (with or without Intellectual Ventures) playing a good cop, bad cop style extortion racquet.
How does that insurance look now?
Buyer beware!
- PythonicAlpha 12y agoIsn't that what "patent trolls" are doing all day: Sell "insurances" to other companies .... In the middle ages, some called such things "way toll" and those who asked for it where called "robber-knight".
- cheepin 12y agoNowadays we call them rent-seekers.
- PythonicAlpha 12y agoAs non-Nativespeaker, I did not know that word before ... Thanks!
- alexqgb 12y agoSo just like the Mafia they're "offering" to sell you protection from...themselves.
- Joeri 12y agoWouldn't they be liable for racketeering? If it can be demonstrated that a large share of NPE lawsuits originate with IV (over a thousand shell companies), and that they actively prevent meaningful patent reform (dedicated lobbying office in washington), it seems like they should be liable.