> Realistically she has an army of people to handle affairs and things that I couldn't dream of doing. Again, I think you are falling into the trap of defining

> Realistically she has an army of people to handle affairs and things that I couldn't dream of doing. Again, I think you are falling into the trap of defining "work" globally by what you know locally. Just because she's not having to, say, schedule her own meetings, doesn't preclude her from working. > We completely differ on the definition of work then. Undoubtedly we do. Show two people on the internet a word, get three definitions. > Art takes labor, but it's not work because you're creating something from nothing using a skill that is inherent to the person within. I'm a programmer, and I meet the above criteria, yet I still feel like I'm working. But again, our definition or "work" is undoubtedly different. > $84,000 PER WEEK buys a lot of help. It's needed at that level, I get that...but it also only happens due to being part of a system that exists solely to feed itself. Not sure what this has to do with work. I think in the end you're more worried about the purity of the "art" or something like that. I have nothing to say about that, because I don't consider myself an artist. Maybe she's a sell out, maybe she's not. I don't know. I don't care honestly. She's a genius in my book, and a hard freakin worker to have built what she has.