3 ms·
The real problem with any tex preprocessor is getting your collaborators to use it. One solution is to have a preprocessor that can go backwards, so that when y
by j2kun 12y ago
The real problem with any tex preprocessor is getting your collaborators to use it. One solution is to have a preprocessor that can go backwards, so that when your collaborators edit you can keep working where they left off. Does PreTeX have such a feature?
- s9w 12y agoI've thought about doing this bidirectionally. Besides implementing that all, the problem I see would be having a reasonable "cutoff". It probably wouldn't make sense to use the shortened <bra|ket> notation if the term was insanely huge. So There would be some heuristics, meaning it can't be guaranteed a 100% accurate back transformation. Still interested? Or maybe there could be an export-mode where the pretex math is backuped in a comment or a separate file to help reconstruction. But that might get awkward fast. Hmm I was hoping that most of the changes are so trivial that this would be unncecessary