3 ms·
I don’t disagree with you one bit, but I find it funny that you say: “we can't currently break them, so tradeoffs will always exist.” :) (That “currently” is j
by micampe 12y ago
I don’t disagree with you one bit, but I find it funny that you say: “we can't currently break them, so tradeoffs will always exist.” :)
(That “currently” is just a weasel word, but this being the Internet I understand why you put it there)
- Xylakant 12y agoWell, I can rephrase that "I don't expect fundamental laws of nature to change any time soon." But laws that were assumed to be fundamental have been found to be false in the past, so I don't want to rule that out for the future either.
- jjoonathan 12y agoIt is highly probable that we will discover memory that is better than current memory in every relevant metric (I suspect this is what you think you are claiming). It is highly improbable that this new technology cannot be optimized in any relevant metric by trading off optimality in a different metric (this is what you are actually claiming).
- micampe 12y agoThe sentence “I'm certain the tradeoffs will change” implies that both your interpretations are wrong.