2 ms·
The only argument I tried to make, admittedly poorly, is that I notice a contrast between how good they say they are for open source, and actual behaviour from
by voidz 12y ago
The only argument I tried to make, admittedly poorly, is that I notice a contrast between how good they say they are for open source, and actual behaviour from the developers.
I did not say or intend to say "good for them, I hope GNOME loses their brand", well ok I did say that a little. So let me state it differently - that many of their own design decisions also were against open (libre) source philosophies.
- icebraining 12y agoI don't think your definition of open source philosophies is widely shared.
- Argorak 12y agoThe product being free software doesn't entitle you to anything regarding their project policies, steering and development. It entitles you to a number of rights on the resulting product, nothing less and more. And that's already quite a lot.