3 ms·
Did you mean that my summary was a title, not a summary? I didn't quite understand "described the function of the title". Right now I'm thinking only poorly wr
by KajMagnus 12y ago
Did you mean that my summary was a title, not a summary? I didn't quite understand "described the function of the title".
Right now I'm thinking only poorly written comments and off-topic threads would benefit from being summarized. A good comment starts with attracting attention and interest, and a summary would destroy that.
A poorly written comment though, it might be verbose and chatty, and it might make the discussion stray off-topic. Then, instead of just collapsing a not-so-popular off-topic thread and showing the text "Click to view 33 comments", one could show a summary: "Click to view a suggestion to summarize threads and a discussion about if doing so makes sense (33 comments)". Or "Click to view a joke (5 comments)".
(I agree this is getting complicated for long threads that branches off in many directions.)
- krapp 12y ago> I didn't quite understand "described the function of the title". Sorry, I meant the purpose of the title was to do what you did - to briefly summarize a post. Since it's your thread, obviously, it would be easy for you to describe your own intent, but it might be much more difficult to do analytically.