4 ms·
So you throw out the ambiguous and obvious patents. It doesn't mean you throw out the entire IP framework. This is akin to the folks who claim we should go ba
by gills 17y ago
So you throw out the ambiguous and obvious patents. It doesn't mean you throw out the entire IP framework.
This is akin to the folks who claim we should go back to physical gold as money because fiat money has been abused. Fiat money isn't evil, it's incredibly useful, but we've failed to stem the corruption in our government that allows it to be abused.
My point is that the abuse of a system does not make that system inherently evil, it just means we need to learn from the mistakes and mature as a society. Lean towards overturning the lame software patents for a couple decades and tighten up the standards for new ones.
- cwp 17y agoWho said "inherently evil?" On the whole, I'd say that software patents do more harm than good, and should be eliminated on that basis. I agree that it's not inherently evil doesn't mean we should do it.