4 ms·
"In other words, what we know about the past signals that we are in a truly traumatic phase of the planet’s history that could affect much of life on Earth, inc
by igravious 12y ago
"In other words, what we know about the past signals that we are in a truly traumatic phase of the planet’s history that could affect much of life on Earth, including our species."
'traumatic' is an emotive non-scientific word. From who's perspective? From this one person? From the perspective of humanity? The biosphere? The Earth?
Were the previous mass extinction phases 'traumatic'? If not, why not? If it were not for those previous phases then perhaps evolution would never have come up with talking monkeys. And what if the by-product of our current mass extinction phase is something that could not have happened without this mass dying off. What then?
Maybe if you want to be a palaeontologist actually use scientific language rather than non-scientific judgements.
- jschwartzi 12y agoIf we had actually been alive to witness those past mass extinctions, we would likely have been traumatized by the disappearance of so much life from the face of the Earth, and all in one relatively short period of time.
- ende 12y agoBeing a NYT piece, the author was likely heavily coached.