4 ms·
> "web agencies" who build shitty typo3 pages en masse This is what our initial success was built on. We had a two-pronged approach. First, in the homeland of
by Udo 12y ago
> "web agencies" who build shitty typo3 pages en masse
This is what our initial success was built on. We had a two-pronged approach.
First, in the homeland of typo3, we got massive mileage out of our own CMS product which could do everything that was oh so painful with the usual products in this space. We became the "can do" guys, and we could do everything so much faster and more elegantly than the competition.
Our second angle was our stealthiness: since agencies are in the business of appearing way larger and more talented than they actually are, bringing in outside contractors was a serious loss of face for them. We offered to appear as internal agency staff in all customer interactions. We would go to on-site meetings in their clothing style, even. Technical customer support calls were transparently routed to our office, to complete the illusion that everything was done in-house at the agency.
Everything else we did wrong, though. We had too many employees, some of them were bad hires to begin with, and we worked them too hard, too. You can't keep a whole team in death march mode all the time. We founders were terrible bosses, as well. I was way too friendly to the point of being taken advantage of, another founder was just generally clueless about everything, and the third one was so harsh and troubled when he patrolled through the offices it actually looked and felt like he was captain Ahab tormenting his trembling crew. Then the budgets of the agencies crumbled suddenly, and almost over night there was just no more money. The little work we got came at unworkable margins. Agencies were poaching our employees. We took on big, risky projects just to stay afloat. One of our biggest customers went bankrupt and then sued us for everything they had paid for our services in the last 12 months. And they won (still a bit unclear how that was even possible, but I found out later their CEO was personal friends with the judge).
All in all, it was one hell of a learning experience. But there were some good times as well. And the freedom to work on something you care about is just priceless.
- k__ 12y ago> Everything else we did wrong lol, implying completing "the illusion that everything was done in-house at the agency" wasn't wrong in the first place. Anyway, I still can't imagine why people found agencies. If I want to do consulting, I'd become a freelancer, this pays much better and there is plenty of work. If I don't, I would work at a real software company that builds and sells software products...
- nmcfarl 12y agoI have a good friend who works at an agency and he does it for these reasons: 1) As a consultant you have to be constantly networking, and selling yourself, to keep the pipeline full. He hates that, being on the antisocial side. 2) As an employee at a traditional firm one works on one product in one industry, for multiple years in a row. He works on about 4 products in 4 industries a year. 3) Working for an agency he makes more than he would as an in house employee, yet has a number of employee like perks. This is largely because he's good, and has negotiated hard - but this stuff would be harder as a freelancer.
- Udo 12y agoYou are unkind but not entirely wrong. If you read my previous comment closely: that's something which gave us an edge early on but later became an albatross around our necks.
- k__ 12y agoI'm sorry. I have some hard feelings about consulting :\