4 ms·
Depends on the country. In UK truth is no defense for libel. Also if you are sued for libel in US and prove that they indeed have a security hole that gives th
by sharpneli 12y ago
Depends on the country. In UK truth is no defense for libel.
Also if you are sued for libel in US and prove that they indeed have a security hole that gives them the evidence directly to sue you for 'hacking' their site.
- noir_lord 12y agoUS courts (at a state level) have occasionally ruled similarly, it is a worrying trend. > The court ruled in the case of Noonan v. Staples that truth published with “actual malice” gleaned from the context of the statement can give rise to a libel lawsuit. http://itlaw.wikia.com/wiki/Noonan_v._Staples http://itlaw.wikia.com/wiki/Noonan_v._Staples
- DanBC 12y ago> In UK truth is no defense for libel. What? http://www.senseaboutscience.org/data/files/A_quick_guide_to_libel_laws_in_England_and_Wales.pdf http://www.senseaboutscience.org/data/files/A_quick_guide_to... > Justification: a defendant must show that the substance and fact of what they have written is true. However, a judge decides what the words meant, and therefore what a defendant must prove to be true – sometimes not what a defendant expects. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_defamation_law http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_defamation_law > Allowable defences are justification (i.e. the truth of the statement), Edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation_Act_2013 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation_Act_2013 > and introducing new statutory defences of truth, honest opinion, and 'publication on a matter of public interest' or privileged publications (including peer reviewed scientific journals),