4 ms·
you put an awful lot of words in my mouth. i didn't mention scrolling. re-read. the top bar is too large vertically without enough value. readability improves
by davmar 12y ago
you put an awful lot of words in my mouth. i didn't mention scrolling. re-read.
the top bar is too large vertically without enough value. readability improves a bit, but the sheer prominence takes away from the discoverability of the first article title.
i didn't mention type size or whitespace. i also like large type and generous amounts of whitespace.
i think you're just looking to argue for the sake of argument.
- nilliams 12y agoSorry, I'm not looking for an argument and I didn't mean to put words in your mouth. My original post was badly written and overly argumentative, I think I was in a bad mood and a couple of your points just set off my usual UX'y triggers, I apologise. You're right that I made the leap from your dislike of the top nav/footer to a dislike of scrolling/desire for 'information density'. Those things are often associated but I was wrong to make that leap. Again, my bad. I disagree with your points that the header and footer are distracting and detract from the articles, that's it and that's all my original post should have said.