3 ms·
My mistake and too late to edit. I don't use "await" and I misread this at first. Actually the classic tasks way would be to add these to an array of tasks, an
by jasallen 12y ago
My mistake and too late to edit. I don't use "await" and I misread this at first. Actually the classic tasks way would be to add these to an array of tasks, and then "WhenAll" for the continuation.
- mythz 12y agoyes it's easier to fire and wait for async tasks in parallel - but I specifically mentioned processing serial async responses, i.e. sequentially like a normal for loop.