4 ms·
At least for the past decade or so, I would (roughly and humbly) put Ruby and Python on par with Perl 5 for the purposes of system administration, with a whole
by Diederich 12y ago
At least for the past decade or so, I would (roughly and humbly) put Ruby and Python on par with Perl 5 for the purposes of system administration, with a whole lot of pros, cons and caveats. Very roughly. It's just that, as a language, Perl has always resonated with me, even though I've rather enjoyed writing in both Ruby and Python.
Assuming you are akin to 'Jill Sysadmin' or 'Joe Devops', I would honestly say that Perl 6 won't be more compelling than Perl 5 for a while.
And, by the way, Perl 5 has grown enormously in the past 10 years. I would say that if you haven't taken a look in a while, give it another shake.
I honestly struggle to imagine the really cool things that will start to come out of Perl 6 acceleration. It has some really novel concurrency concepts, far more interesting than goroutines, for instance.
And once again, I believe Perl 6 will turn into a very fast language.
- bane 12y ago> And, by the way, Perl 5 has grown enormously in the past 10 years. I would say that if you haven't taken a look in a while, give it another shake. this. I can hack a bit in Perl 5, but "modern Perl" is virtually a unique language that just so happens to be written using the same words I use. I haven't had a chance to really learn modern practices, I keep telling myself I'm going to sit down and do it, but I haven't had a chance. But what I've seen is really pretty different than what I grew up with. It's pretty amazing.
- collyw 12y agoI still find Perl is better for some tasks (over Python - I don't know Ruby). It has loads of syntactic sugar such as globbing files, backticks for executing system calls.