3 ms·

I'm sure the journalist in question who should learn not to write gibberish, ensure he's inserted his operational definitions and check his prose for floating a

by vixen99 12y ago

I'm sure the journalist in question who should learn not to write gibberish, ensure he's inserted his operational definitions and check his prose for floating abstractions is properly put to rights! I guess you weren't referring to the actual paper since it can hardly turn out to be interesting and gibberish at one and the same time.

ithkuil 12y ago
Since both outcomes are possible, by following the constructor principle, the paper will be in a superimposed quantum state of interesting at gibberish. And it will collapse in one of those states when somebody (knowledgeable in the field) reads it. EDIT: the analogy is broken on purpose, to cause a logical paradox