4 ms·
Interesting. These seem to strike a balance between Apple's decidedly glosss-but-normal-shaped emoji and Google's flat-but-ghost-shaped emoji. I'd say that we r
by MAGZine 12y ago
Interesting. These seem to strike a balance between Apple's decidedly glosss-but-normal-shaped emoji and Google's flat-but-ghost-shaped emoji. I'd say that we really need an open emoji standard, but we all know how that goes.
- surreal 12y agoWe do indeed - http://xkcd.com/927/ http://xkcd.com/927/
- marcuskaz 12y agoThere is a Unicode standard, see http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2014/06/unicode-7-0-introduces-2834-new-characters-including-250-emoji/ http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2014/06/unicode-7-0-introduce... which explains a lot about emoji. There is room for interpretation to what each drawing will look like in each implementations. The standard simply says something like: "Cloud With Lightning"
- veidr 12y ago> Google's flat-but-ghost-shaped emoji Until this moment I have always wondered why Google chose to use poo-shaped emoji...