4 ms·
foobar2000 is a more recent work from one of the original devs, and quite good if you're looking for minimalism and function over style. And of course, if you'
by jarcane 12y ago
foobar2000 is a more recent work from one of the original devs, and quite good if you're looking for minimalism and function over style.
And of course, if you're on Unixen, XMMS is pretty much a direct clone of the old Winamp (and used to even use the same skin by default).
- busterarm 12y agoMy goto player these days is MOC.
- dr_zoidberg 12y agoI use foobar2000 too, however I don't agree with "function over style", there are some skins and options that change it completely. I think we should agree it's highly customizable, both for function or style.
- jarcane 12y agoFair enough. I always left it on default, and it's not the prettiest thing then, or wasn't at the time.
- puzzlingcaptcha 12y agoAnother capable linux alternative is Audacious.
- Eiriksmal 12y agoFoobar's the only realistic alternative because it's the only one, that I know of, that supports the full gamut of plugins written to play video game/ancient computer audio files. Mostly because guys like Neill Corlett wrote all those plugins ~15-10 years ago when your only choices were Winamp or Foobar. http://www.zophar.net/music.html http://www.zophar.net/music.html Audacious comes close, but isn't quite there. PSF2 support is mostly non-functional, for instance.
- jarcane 12y agoFor me, I used foobar because it was the last one that didn't try to be 'smart' about shuffle play.