3 ms·
Perhaps it worked better on your browser, but the content was so delayed that many times I scrolled past it before it decided to load. So I was constantly havin
by dbpatterson 12y ago
Perhaps it worked better on your browser, but the content was so delayed that many times I scrolled past it before it decided to load. So I was constantly having to scroll back and forth to try to figure out whether a blank spot was truly blank (sometimes it was). Pretty frustrating. And the irony is almost too much...
- fourstar 12y agoThere's a big button in the upper right hand corner for an audio version, ya dingus. Ever thought that might be useful for people who can't read the website?
- simonh 12y agoI can read perfectly well. But if the web site I'm looking at is so badly designed that it's unreadable, why should I expect that an audio version will be better thought out? There are perfectly good reasons for providing audio content on a web site, but having a badly designed site isn't one of them.
- Eyas 12y agoI think he GP was referring to visually impaired people, per the post they were responding to (about the "irony", etc.).