2 ms·
> Honestly, I find it impossible to believe the Uber team is both this B-movie-level evil, and stupid. It's really, really hard to believe that a COO of a succe
by chimeracoder 12y ago
> Honestly, I find it impossible to believe the Uber team is both this B-movie-level evil, and stupid. It's really, really hard to believe that a COO of a successful startup wouldn't know how to copy documents that are on his OWN MACHINE (the private dropbox documents).
> So, since Lyft obviously gets assloads of free publicity from all these accusations, and since I've never seen an actual court judgment against Uber reported, I somewhat doubt that these are actually true, or at least not actually provable, since like others have said, if Lyft could successfully sue Uber over any one of these things, the media would have even more of a field day than it's having now.
So just to clarify, you think Lyft is making these accusations up for the sake of getting publicity?
And fabricating evidence to file in a lawsuit?
- tedks 12y agoI admit it's far fetched, but to quote the Romans, who benefits? Fabricating evidence seems a bit of a stretch, but hey, we're already believing that a COO can't copy files. I'd say that the most likely explanation is a nice mix of malice and stupidity on both sides. Maybe Uber did do something wrong. Maybe Lyft blew it out of proportion and went to all the journalists they knew to get it out there. Maybe the whole thing is an elaborate triple ruse. But seriously, are there any publicly available judgments about any of these yet? It's getting unbelievable without them.