7 ms·
Could you be more specific about what you don't like about it?
by RussianCow 12y ago
Could you be more specific about what you don't like about it?
- wnevets 12y agoExtremely derivative and already talked to death here on HN. There is virtually nothing original in this article.
- mistermumble 12y agoThis is the first time I have read some of these criticisms of Angular on HN. Can you point to threads where there was discussion of these issues? Would like to get more info on these. Thanks.
- tim333 12y agoThere's some stuff here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8507632 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8507632 and here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8527230 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8527230
- DonHopkins 12y agoPlease give us links to all the articles criticizing Angular that you think make this article redundant?
- wnevets 12y agolmgtfy https://hn.algolia.com/#!/story/forever/0/angularjs https://hn.algolia.com/#!/story/forever/0/angularjs
- talmand 12y agoAh yes, the old "this has be discussed before" statement that assumes that everyone has already read everything and that new people to the group should always search through old posts about subjects they may not even know exist. Because nothing must ever be discussed more than once. Usually stated by people who feel the need to comment in the thread about an article covering a subject they've already read about; just to point out they don't want to read about the subject again. It's like a driving need to spread their negativity towards discussing anything more than once.
- rmsaksida 12y agoI actually think this is a good thing. Angular doesn't get nearly enough heat for its flaws. The more they are publicized, the more the framework can improve.
- recursive 12y agoIt's new to me.