4 ms·
It doesn't quite prove that it's good for writing compilers, merely that it can be used for writing compilers.
by PudgePacket 12y ago
It doesn't quite prove that it's good for writing compilers, merely that it can be used for writing compilers.
- bjz_ 12y agoAh yes. Correct.
- mercurial 12y agoIt's still a fair amount of code, and means dealing with less CS-y things but still practical things like command-line arguments, data structures, file handling...
- pdpi 12y agoTo be fair, commandline arguments and file handling fall under the heading of "things that get your language get eliminated from ever being taken seriously if they're not straightforward to do". Data structures... how do you figure they're "less CS-y things"?
- mercurial 12y agoI'll blame the lack of tea. Data structures are quite CS-y. The point is, you have enough complexity in a compiler to find out a number of weaknesses in your language if you self-host, even if it doesn't cover everything.