4 ms·

Every single one of the Polar watches that have been out for decades?

• unwind 12y ago
  That's not an accurate comparison, since the Polar watches don't do pulse monitoring by themselves, they require a chest band accessory that contains the actual sensor (see http://www.polar.com/en/products/accessories/H1_heart_rate_sensor http://www.polar.com/en/products/accessories/H1_heart_rate_s...). That's like at least an order of magnitude less convenient than having pulse monitoring integrated in the watch (or wristband) itself, in my opinion.
  • andygates 12y ago
    It's also an order of magnitude more accurate (source: testing my Polar H7 and my Moto 360) Current optical HRMs seem to peak out in intense activity, which is exactly when they're most useful. The whole bunch seem good for general fitness, but not for athletic performance. For that a chest band still can't be beat.
    • eitally 12y ago
      And this, to me, makes them almost useless. That said, there are optical HRMs that are accurate and aimed at athletes, but ... they're aimed at athletes. Fitbit/Jawbone/etc aren't. http://www.mioglobal.com/Default.aspx http://www.mioglobal.com/Default.aspx http://4iiii.com/product/viva-mini/ http://4iiii.com/product/viva-mini/ (this is just a wrist strap, but they're about to release an all-in-one)