3 ms·
It's fairly understandable given that those 30% of airports probably carry more than 90% of general commercial passenger traffic. Certainly enough to build tra
by jka 12y ago
It's fairly understandable given that those 30% of airports probably carry more than 90% of general commercial passenger traffic.
Certainly enough to build travel booking engines on, as many have proven - but it'd be interesting as a niche project to provide a tool for arranging/searching for more regional airport transport options. Flight-sharing via local airports, for example :)
- bengali3 12y agoyes, general aviation tools have to account for ICAO, IATA and abbreviation lookups. (many times the 'K' prefix from the ICAO gets dropped in communications) FMI see: http://skyvector.com/ http://skyvector.com/ (see text box, upper left) http://charternation.com/airports/ http://charternation.com/airports/ http://www.airnav.com/airports/ http://www.airnav.com/airports/