3 ms·
From the conclusion: The data indicates functional languages are better than procedural languages; it suggest that strong typing is better than weaking typic;
by oskarth 12y ago
From the conclusion:
The data indicates functional languages are better than procedural languages; it suggest that strong typing is better than weaking typic; that static typing is better than dynamic; and that managed memory usage is better than unmanaged.
Obviously not the last word, but interesting study nonetheless.
- djur 12y agoThe worst outcome was for Procedural-Static-Weak-Unmanaged, aka C and C++. There is no OO category, since most OO languages can be (and are) used in a procedural style.
- pathikrit 12y agoBecause there are no Procedural-Dynamic-Weak-Unmanaged languages :)
- abecedarius 12y agoForth! (I haven't read the paper.)
- Immortalin 12y agoForth is untyped, not dynamically typed. ;)