3 ms·
Even now that there are finally published DVD's -- I guess this is some years ago, already -- I find they aren't worth it. Because they removed so much of the
by pasbesoin 12y ago
Even now that there are finally published DVD's -- I guess this is some years ago, already -- I find they aren't worth it. Because they removed so much of the original music. I remember watching the first episode and wondering, "What the hell is wrong with this?" Then it clicked.
As far as I am concerned, I think this is downright wrong. "Northern Exposure" -- pop culture though it might be labeled by some -- was a significant contribution to contemporary culture for many of us. It was one of those "water cooler" shows, around which everyone would be discussing it in the days following broadcast.
The fact that a private entity can simply "remove" such a element from our public culture and ongoing conversation -- or edit it into something else -- is, in my opinion, not something that was intended with "intellectual property".
Paying a reasonable fee is one thing. No (legal) access, whatsoever? That should not be permitted.
P.S. For those who are not familiar with it, in "Northern Exposure" a thoughtful and thematic selection of music became akin to another (omni-present) character. Removing those choices is akin to ripping (editing) a major character right out of the finished work.
- ChickeNES 12y agoHell, I can't even watch "House" on Netflix because of the removal of Massive Attack's "Teardrop" as the theme music. Ditto with the later seasons of Married with Children and the god-awful Joe Cocker impersonator they got for "The Wonder Years"