4 ms·

I'm curious why NeDB wouldn't suffice. https://github.com/louischatriot/nedb https://github.com/louischatriot/nedb

• yourad_io 12y ago
  From the slideshare presentation on the homepage (p. 4)[1] > Performs better than similar products (NeDB, TaffyDB, PouchDB etc.) and it's much smaller It would be interesting to see benchmarks. [1] http://www.slideshare.net/techfort/lokijs/4 http://www.slideshare.net/techfort/lokijs/4
  • fiatjaf 12y ago
    Ok, TaffyDB is a piece of crap. You call `.fetch` to fetch a document at some id, but if you modify your fetched copy, the copy in the database is also modified. With a database like this I'm much better with a hashmap.
  • jedireza 12y ago
    Thanks for sharing that. I jumped the gun before commenting.
    • yourad_io 12y ago
      No worries. I just noticed they include the benchmarks here [1] [1] https://github.com/techfort/LokiJS/tree/master/benchmark https://github.com/techfort/LokiJS/tree/master/benchmark
  • kristopolous 12y ago
    there is this benchmark : https://github.com/danstocker/jorder/wiki/Benchmarks https://github.com/danstocker/jorder/wiki/Benchmarks ... I maintain this one (https://github.com/kristopolous/db.js https://github.com/kristopolous/db.js) which is part of that. From my perspective, with a small collection size, I'll sacrifice performance for expressiveness. I have a number of expensive features that I think do nice things.