Which says a lot more about our zombie-like ways of measuring "performance" in human beings (and in high school students especially), than whether AI is actuall

Which says a lot more about our zombie-like ways of measuring "performance" in human beings (and in high school students especially), than whether AI is actually catching up on us in any meaningful sense. (If a high school student bombed that one multiple-choice example, most likely it's because they were fatigued at the testing process itself -- it's hard to imagine them making any of the wrong choices given in an actual, real-life setting).