3 ms·
> Removing it would mean "we're free to do evil now" It's a subtle distinction, but the motto is "don't be evil", not "don't do evil." The former allows you to
by curun1r 12y ago
> Removing it would mean "we're free to do evil now"
It's a subtle distinction, but the motto is "don't be evil", not "don't do evil." The former allows you to do evil things in service to noble purposes. For example, "don't do evil" would have required the company to shut down services rather than sharing information with the NSA. "Don't be evil" allowed them to balance that evil action against the good created by those services to realize a net-positive societal benefit from offering those services.
- hawkice 12y agoPerhaps a better example: Censorship in Google China. The "don't do evil" vs "don't be evil" was almost exactly how they pitched that conversation.
- wavefunction 12y agoDoing evil is being evil. End of discussion.
- gtremper 12y agoWell, everyone is evil then.