5 ms·
That's clear - but that's not the case presented in the slides... "Automatic" is clear, "getter-only" is clear, but "automatic getter-only" leaves me scratchin
by andrea_s 12y ago
That's clear - but that's not the case presented in the slides...
"Automatic" is clear, "getter-only" is clear, but "automatic getter-only" leaves me scratching my head.
- moron4hire 12y agoDo you know where it is in the video? Are they not talking about something like this? public bool IsOpen{get; private set;} public void Open(){ try{ // do some complex work this.IsOpen = true; } catch{ this.IsOpen = false; } } public void Close(){ // do some other work this.IsOpen = false; }
- andrea_s 12y agoNot sure about the minute, the video is prohibitively long... It's on the 9th slide: https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=http%3a%2f%2fvideo.ch9.ms%2fsessions%2fteched%2feu%2f2014%2fDEV-B345.pptx https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=http%3a%2f...
- moron4hire 12y agoI see. Maybe they mean "implicit private set"? Otherwise, one of the sibling comments has a good point about the binary compatibility issues with fields vs properties.