3 ms·
I liked this part: Food is now politics and ethics as much as it is sustenance ... it’s a form of surrogate politics. To some, it’s not even surrogate politics
by mturmon 12y ago
I liked this part:
Food is now politics and ethics as much as it is sustenance ... it’s a form of surrogate politics. To some, it’s not even surrogate politics; it’s the real deal, politics at its most urgent and consequential. [...]
I’m thrilled by this notion, and yet I find that I can’t submit to it. [...] If shopping and cooking really are the most consequential, most political acts in my life, perhaps what that means is that our sense of the political has shrunk too far [...] Imagine that you die and go to Heaven and stand in front of a jury made up of Thomas Jefferson, Eleanor Roosevelt, and Martin Luther King, Jr. Your task would be to compose yourself, look them in the eye, and say, “I was all about fresh, local, and seasonal.”
*
Food choices matter, but it's important to understand that a politics limited to consumer choices (like food, or boycotts) is very limited and unlikely to make much difference. There are exceptions (like South Africa), but the record is not very strong.
- judk 12y agoThe author doesn't care about animal ethics or sustainable agriculture, and mocks those who do to cover his guilt. Good for him. Thomas Jefferson bred human slaves for profit. I am OK taking his spot in heaven. *Neither TJ nor I believe heaven exists.
- coldtea 12y ago>The author doesn't care about animal ethics or sustainable agriculture, and mocks those who do to cover his guilt. What guilt? One should only care about those things without guilt if he has already cared and done something about the more important issues. And, no, "I let global warming and racism for others to take care of, my call was to care for animal ethics" is not something I'd take seriously.