If a prosecutor's chief career metric is his conviction rate, then he doesn't have much incentive to reelease exonerating evidence. I wonder if changing the ru

If a prosecutor's chief career metric is his conviction rate, then he doesn't have much incentive to reelease exonerating evidence. I wonder if changing the rules would help. Releasing such evidence and causing the case to collapse would not reduce the conviction percentage. Perhaps it could even be counted as a win, increasing the metric, because justice was done.