4 ms·

I also prefer cntrlp, it's much more performant in my experience.

• sooheon 12y ago
  This is true (something like junegunn's fzf is even faster than either), but I think the tradeoff is between performance and consistency of interface. Unite can provide the same interactions for recent files, buffers, file navigation, grep results, etc.
  • tomjakubowski 12y ago
    You can do this with ctrlp too. The standard sources are files, buffer, and MRU files, but it comes with extensions for things like the quickfix list (grep results), tags, and scripts in the runtime path. You can also write your own: https://github.com/kien/ctrlp.vim/tree/extensions https://github.com/kien/ctrlp.vim/tree/extensions
• shocks 12y ago
  Really? With unite you can use vimproc to fork out the searching process. Much quicker. Using unite and ctrlp with a 30k file source base, ctrlp was far to slow for me.