> The fact that a single, first-person consciousness exists is entirely objective. I wouldn't describe my consciousness as 'single or 'first-person. It often r

> The fact that a single, first-person consciousness exists is entirely objective. I wouldn't describe my consciousness as 'single or 'first-person. It often runs multiple threads, and by no means exclusively thinks of itself in the first-person. Additionally, it really doesn't identify with this body much more than, say, this house or computer. My consciousness isn't 'human any more than it's "ranch-style" or 'x86. Our language has already adopted inorganic technologies as extensions of ourselves (e.g. I say "I'll come over" which expands to "I'll come over in my car").