2 ms·
I think part of the problem is that if we restrict the usage of the term FRP to only include Elliott's work, then there is a void currently as to how to charact
by platz 12y ago
I think part of the problem is that if we restrict the usage of the term FRP to only include Elliott's work, then there is a void currently as to how to characterize all these derivative forms, and not many are offering an alternative classification.
This is why I appreciated Evan's talk in attaching labels to different portions of the space.
- tel 12y agoI agree and would like to see a proliferation of more well-designed technical terms. I think the rest of the space sort of lacks enough clustering/commonality/analysis to pick too many terms yet—the places which are well-defined already have names like RtFRP and AFRP.