I wasn't referring to the "it encourages people to be nicer" (which is obviously a ridiculous argument too) but to the "nothing to hide" argument: > My main ob

I wasn't referring to the "it encourages people to be nicer" (which is obviously a ridiculous argument too) but to the "nothing to hide" argument: > My main objection to the "right to be forgotten" is that censorship of non-defamatory information helps unsavory people more than nicer ones. You did have a good argument though: > And there's the problem inherent in all censorship: Who do you trust to determine what you're allowed to read or say?