I was really hoping there was more hear about the technology, specifically what they are doing differently and the backgrounds of the engineers making this a re

I was really hoping there was more hear about the technology, specifically what they are doing differently and the backgrounds of the engineers making this a reality. The process of raising money and getting buy-in is far less interesting than demos showing how much electricity is going into the transmitter and how much is being received by the receivers, especially under the conditions he says they can deal with (movement, etc). This is one of those ideas that fails or succeeds on the technology. As background, talent, gumption and charisma of the non-technical people is irrelevant if the technology isn't there. It's a very strong sell from a VC without evidence. If they can do some of the things claimed, wouldn't you let the evidence speak for itself?