3 ms·
To say nothing of its merit, it looks like they're going to rely on the justification that reversing past deregulation policy would create a situation where the
by jrcii 12y ago
To say nothing of its merit, it looks like they're going to rely on the justification that reversing past deregulation policy would create a situation where their own past arguments would be used against them in court when the ISPs inevitably challenge their decision.
- doctorshady 12y agoI'm thinking the ISPs will probably challenge it anyway. The impression I'm getting is a lot of them wanted nothing to do with Title II.
- privong 12y agoExcept when it benefits them: https://www.techdirt.com/blog/netneutrality/articles/20141030/07033428985/verizon-title-ii-is-not-answer-except-when-it-gives-us-massive-subsidies-then-its-totally-answer.shtml https://www.techdirt.com/blog/netneutrality/articles/2014103...
- sgift 12y ago"We've wised up on our earlier judgement. We were wrong when we stated these things because of foo, bar, baz, bat, bam, bla" ... that sounds like a good answer to any "You had other arguments in the past!!!" attack?