4 ms·
Looks pretty cool. Lots of useful stats, though they are stats that are usually pretty easy to obtain elsewhere. I would have said I'm not sure I'd pay for it,
by JangoSteve 17y ago
Looks pretty cool. Lots of useful stats, though they are stats that are usually pretty easy to obtain elsewhere. I would have said I'm not sure I'd pay for it, but the plans are cheap enough. I just probably won't ever be actively managing more than 10 sites at once, so I don't think I'd ever need one of the pay plans.
I actually have a buddy developing a similar concept to this that does a little more in terms of utility, though his hasn't launched yet.
The design leaves a lot to be desired. I would consider a severe make-over. A lot of the interface just doesn't feel right.
Oh, and also, I couldn't do one of my sites, because it doesn't allow the .edu domain apparently. Is there a reason it whitelists the tld's that can be monitored?
edit
I just realized this "review" came off with much more negative feedback than positive, which I don't think is appropriate, because I really do like this app. So, I'll just leave it at that.
- middayc 17y agoYes, those stats can be obtained by other means. S-A helps webmasters that need to manage 30, 50, 100 websites and obtaining stats for that many websites (and making them easily viewable with views,filters, details) would take A LOT of time. S-A is made to start being useful after you add at least 10 websites. ==== I would really really appreciate if you give me some hints about the most painful parts of design/interface :) ==== .com .net .org .biz .info .us .eu .fr .si are allowed for now. The reason is that each TLD's whois returns differently formatted data that we then parse and extract the relevant bits from. They start repeating after a while and we will certainly be adding other TLD-s. We are still more focused at designing the core, what to show, how.. etc. it's ok, and thanks a lot for your review :)