2 ms·
You just listed how the Canadian policy lets the husband take time also (more time, if they want, such as in your case). That suggests that companies would be e
by lhc- 12y ago
You just listed how the Canadian policy lets the husband take time also (more time, if they want, such as in your case). That suggests that companies would be equally "punished" by hiring men who want families. Why would that policy only harm women's employment options?
- Pxtl 12y agoBecause realistically I'm unusual for using it, and I used it for only one of my three kids. In my progressive, bleeding-heart-liberal family? The man still represented only 7 months of leave time, while the woman represented 29. The "leave cost" whatever it may be was 4X higher for my wife. From a policy perspective, it's roughly egalitarian... but you can't ignore the cultural difference that means 100% maternal leave is the default assumption.