3 ms·
The reason is obvious - the postgres-driven version lets you query the system in realtime, rather than repeatedly updating the database through a manual process
by Sir_Cmpwn 12y ago
The reason is obvious - the postgres-driven version lets you query the system in realtime, rather than repeatedly updating the database through a manual process every so often.
- peterwwillis 12y agoOhhhh, I didn't realize that was the end goal. In that case yeah, this is useful, if you want to run Postgres on every node in your network (which, yikes). Would still rather separate the query engine from the data feed, though. My ideal would be a database application that sends out a request to update the database and returns new records as they come in (or sorted/ordered if preferred)
- hyperliner 12y agoNot wishing to start a battle of civilizations, but this is also possible in SQL Server using User-Defined types. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms131120.aspx http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms131120.aspx