4 ms·
Yes, thank you. Details about the trade-offs involved would be better. My objection is that collectively dealing with them as "the NoSQL databases" tends to obs
by silentbicycle 17y ago
Yes, thank you. Details about the trade-offs involved would be better. My objection is that collectively dealing with them as "the NoSQL databases" tends to obscure that e.g. the key/value stores have very different design and performance trade-offs than CouchDB does, for example. Redis runs entirely in memory, which has big implications for both speed and data set size. And so on.
I should have said "trade-offs" to begin with...that was the heart of what I was getting at when I said "strengths".