4 ms·
Excellent post. As someone who is going to apply to YC this coming winter, this article contains some extremely valuable information. What I get from it mostly
by jlgosse 17y ago
Excellent post. As someone who is going to apply to YC this coming winter, this article contains some extremely valuable information.
What I get from it mostly though, is that getting accepted is less about the application, and more about getting out there and getting things done.
Essentially, I can see a number of common points between both wheels' post and pg's comment:
1. It's a great idea to have something started. Once you have something started, pitching your idea and refining your pitch will surely help you out when explaining what problem you're trying to solve.
2. Contributing to HN often will help build your reputation. Nothing can help grow your reputation online like writing does. I've been told time and time again that I am an excellent writer, and that people respect me for it. If you can write well, contribute to HN.
3. Sharing your product with other people on HN is a great way to get feedback. The more feedback you receive, the greater ability you have to improve your product and eventually succeed.
4. The new(er) feature that allows you to post a video of you and your co-founders may actually be invaluable to getting accepted into the program. I would agree with this in that it's hard to judge a person's qualities from their writing alone. A video will give you a deeper look at their personality, and maybe a glimpse of whether or not they could handle a program such as YC.
With point four in mind, I was wondering if anyone has any advice on a little problem I am having. The problem is derived from the fact that my single co-founder is currently in NYC for the next few months. What would be the best way to create a video for our application, if we are both in different countries?
Thanks,
jlgosse
- thaumaturgy 17y agoYikes. I think your best bet would be to individually shoot some video and splice it together -- even though the app specifically discourages that sort of thing, it would probably be better than no video at all. That is, assuming the two of you can't somehow get together for a day or two.
- arfrank 17y agoI would think what would be better would be to video conference and record that. It would include both of you and practically be the same as if you were just sitting next to each other minus the actual physical proximity.
- rdouble 17y agoindividually shoot some video and splice it together I did this because my co-founder was on tour in the Cayman Islands when we decided to apply for funding. I do not like being on camera, so we were not going to submit a video at all. Pg emailed us and suggested we complete the video. We got an interview, but were not accepted, for reasons which have proven to be painfully prescient.
- jlees 17y agoOr just do a video with one of you. That's what we did, and like rdouble, got interviewed but not accepted.
- jmintz 17y agoWhen we filmed our video, Dave and I were in Chicago but Andy was in California. We got Andy on video chat (Google Talk) and then subtitled what he said (since the microphone didn't pick it up well). Not sure if anyone else did this... :)
- juvenn 17y agoThanks for your clarity writing.