6 ms·
OK, well, that's... Actually worse. Websites should not make changes to a user's settings based simply on a GET against an URL, because the user can click the
by nknighthb 12y ago
OK, well, that's... Actually worse.
Websites should not make changes to a user's settings based simply on a GET against an URL, because the user can click the URL from a random stranger not knowing it would have that effect -- as I did.
Aside from being a poor user experience, what has happened here is someone has deliberately coded a security vulnerability. Granted the impact here is basically trivial, but it's still a pretty classic no-no, and should have immediately set off flashing lights and klaxons in any security-conscious developer's mind.
- textfiles 12y agoI think the dev team would be surprised to hear that getting to see the new site is a security vulnerability!
- nknighthb 12y agoWhile I, sadly, am not at all surprised to hear that yet another group of developers treats security and user experience flippantly. I'm rather starting to regret defending you and lending resources to the twitpic grab.