3 ms·

I thought this was a fairly convincing takedown of the solar roadways project: http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/183130-solar-roadways-passes-1-4-million-in-c

• maerF0x0 12y ago
  Take down seems to forget that we have to replace road surface sometime and _if_ the claim that the solar roadway is net cost cheaper, then it seems to be the best choice. We dont have to dump $51T all at once, or even over 51 yrs timespan. Plus, doing it incrementally has the advantage of evolving in response to field reports/experience.