5 ms·
The B-52 is just as old, and is expected to have served for almost a century once retired. It's not the same as rockets, but "oh it's old" isn't as compelling o
by brandonmenc 12y ago
The B-52 is just as old, and is expected to have served for almost a century once retired. It's not the same as rockets, but "oh it's old" isn't as compelling of an argument as failure rate, which - how many have there been using these engines?
Is that data available?
- venomsnake 12y ago"We saw rust and crack, so we repaired them" seems like the culprit. Not the age.
- brandonmenc 12y agoI was commenting more on the (not surprising) comments from their detractors, not so much on the official explanation.
- alf 12y agoWhich begs the question... If they don't know enough about rockets to build them, how can they possibly know how to safely repair them?
- avmich 12y agoI don't know enough about computers to make my own PC from scratch. I however can fix some problems with PC. So you can have one without another.
- justin66 12y agoThere's a lot less redundancy in a rocket. A B-52 can keep flying if a bunch of stuff stops working or falls off. You just cannot design a rocket that way.
- happycube 12y agoThose B-52's have been maintained (with some parts from boneyard-ed planes, though) and presumably at least occasionally flown all that time...