3 ms·

How are the two comparable? Production, distribution, and storage costs are vastly different. You might as well compare the price with jet fuel, too.

• lucb1e 12y ago
  True, printer ink is mass production so it should be much cheaper.
  • cornewut 12y ago
    Printing with blood is more of a niche market right now. Hussein used to do that, but it never went mainstream [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_Quran http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_Quran]
    • vlunkr 12y ago
      KISS did it as well. http://www.snopes.com/music/artists/kissblood.asp http://www.snopes.com/music/artists/kissblood.asp And The Flaming Lips. http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/wayne-coyne-makes-poster-using-his-own-blood-20101014 http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/wayne-coyne-makes-pos...
  • delecti 12y ago
    Human blood is far more mass produced than printer ink. There are currently about 7 billion mostly independently owned and operated production facilities. The problem is the supply lines and market prices. Distribution of the surplus also tends to be fairly shitty. (that last bit was a poop joke, not a statement about my opinions on the subject of donated blood distribution)
    • drdeca 12y ago
      I thought the joke was about the medical practice of bleeding. If someone has too much blood does it really get disposed of that way? That's interesting, I didn't know that.
      • sliverstorm 12y ago
        If my memory serves, it's more a disposal for old damaged red blood cells than just disposal of excess.