3 ms·
Didn't want to give off a "someones been there and has done that already" vibe, your version definitely looks much better. Honestly, I found WMI to be lacking a
by MrBuddyCasino 12y ago
Didn't want to give off a "someones been there and has done that already" vibe, your version definitely looks much better. Honestly, I found WMI to be lacking and also to be quite slow.
Great to have a better alternative for unixes!
- marpaia 12y agoOf course, it's an intuitive comparison to make. I'm glad you like it! I'm looking forward to working with you and similarly insightful community members on improving osquery for everyone :)
- pstuart 12y agoFederated queries across machines would be quite cool.
- jamii 12y agoThere has been some really interesting work on distributed streaming queries for monitoring/diagnostics eg http://p2.berkeley.intel-research.net/papers/EuroSys2006-debugging.pdf http://p2.berkeley.intel-research.net/papers/EuroSys2006-deb...
- markbnj 12y agoI think Microsoft does deserve some credit for the idea behind WMI, but when I worked with it I always got the sense that the API was sitting on top of a massive hairball that I didn't want to look at for too long. It was slow, but it worked. I'd be thrilled if osquery just achieved the same level of query completeness, and made it easier to find properties and query them. I found WMI confusing in that regard.