3 ms·
does not preclude it gathering whatever data might still exist from the others. It absolutely does preclude that because it's not how the system works. You've
by seiji 12y ago
does not preclude it gathering whatever data might still exist from the others.
It absolutely does preclude that because it's not how the system works. You've described a multi-master system while comparing it against a replication-only system. Apples and racecars.
leaving them out is unjustifiable.
Feel free to submit a pull request fixing any and all deficiencies you've found. :)
- notacoward 12y ago"You've described a multi-master system" No, I haven't, unless you'd say it was already a multi-master system because it allows non-masters to continue without the master being present. What I'm suggesting is just a master being smart enough to recover its own state from where it had been replicated before. How is that even controversial? In what possible use case is it preferable to discard readily available data without an explicit user request to do so? "Feel free to submit a pull request fixing any and all deficiencies you've found." Give me some reason to believe it won't be torpedoed by the next bad decision or failure of diligence that comes to light, and I might. Acknowledging that this needs to be fixed would help.